BENCHMARK PROFILE
Mile High Peptide
Latest sync: Sep 8, 2026, 8:55 AM. Source coverage currently reflects PB Evidence data.
Readers who want the certificate to sit on the same page as the product it describes, and who value seeing exactly which reports a third party can independently confirm.
Vendor-stated: orders completed by 11:00 ship the same day except Saturdays and Sundays, later orders ship the next day, and all orders go out by USPS Priority Mail. The vendor gives a Denver, Colorado location without a street address. Observed August 7, 2026.
This vendor is unrelated to Mile High Compounds, which PeptideBenchmark tracks separately. The BTLabs certificates are issued to Finnrick with the lot field naming Mile High Peptide, so that attribution is what the document shows rather than a direct client relationship. The return policy says all sales are final with a 7-day window only for unopened, intact-seal returns at the buyer’s shipping cost and 48 hours for photographed damage, while the FAQ separately says refunds are case-by-case. Shipping timing is also stated two ways — a same-day 11:00 cutoff in the footer against 1–2 business days in the FAQ. The domain was registered in May 2025, so there is little public operating history behind the catalog.
A Denver, Colorado storefront that publishes its full priced catalog openly and attaches laboratory certificates directly to the products they describe, with most of those reports carrying an independently checkable credential.
Mile High Peptide lists 49 products and 57 comparable research-vial rows across 36 distinct peptides, all readable without an account. Certificates are published as page images inside each product gallery rather than in a separate library, so PeptideBenchmark reads every published image and keeps laboratory-confirmed values separate from what the certificate picture alone shows.
The August 7, 2026 review found 14 distinct certificates across 12 product pages. Ten resolve independently at the issuing laboratory — five ILS Laboratories reports whose portal tokens return the certificate under the Mile High Peptide client name, and five Kovera Labs reports whose printed codes resolve to lab-hosted documents. The remaining four are BTLabs certificates: the laboratory is named and the printed identity, purity, potency and appearance results are recorded, but BTLabs operates no public report lookup, so those reports are not given a verification badge. Panel coverage is identity, purity and net content throughout, with endotoxin reported on two ILS reports; sterility is not reported on any certificate in this set.
This vendor is one of 113 names currently included in our manual curated research-vendor layer.
This is the strongest public transparency pattern on the site. The key signal is that readers can leave the vendor domain and inspect reports or verification pages on an outside provider domain without needing to log in.
- Treat the outside provider route as the strongest part of the evidence, not the vendor marketing copy around it.
- Look for repeated product-level behavior across the catalog, not just one showcase example.
- Do not overread it as proof that every current lot is covered or current unless the linked report trail itself supports that.
This vendor makes the most sense when you compare it to other vendors using a similar transparency model, rather than to every vendor on the board at once.
PB Curated Assessment is a PeptideBenchmark-authored rubric built from the trust and transparency review layer. It is separate from the source-derived benchmark score.
Mile High Peptide is currently one of the strongest curated cases on the site because readers can inspect a repeatable public evidence trail without logging in.
Readers can leave the vendor marketing layer and inspect verification publicly.
This is the strongest public pattern because the verification step routes into an outside provider layer.
Current review touched 59 products and 19 document/link destinations.
3 named lab signal(s) and 1 certification category signal(s) are currently visible in the reviewed evidence.
Score 6.1 from pb evidence score.
PB Curated Assessment: Strong. This is our own trust/transparency rubric and is kept separate from the PB score.
Under the formula retired on Aug 28, 2026 this vendor scores 6.24 — the live evidence-first score is 6.35 (+0.11). What changed and why: scoring methodology.
Observed from public domain records and the vendor's own site on Aug 27, 2026. Identity facts are shown for context and do not affect scores.
Holding a certificate for this vendor that is not here?Send it to the archive →
Same third-party review signals shown on the vendor board. Click Trustpilot or Pep Review Pro to open the source profile.
PB score is the number you should read first on this page. It starts with trust evidence, pricing coverage, and third-party review signals from Finnrick, Peptide Critic, Trustpilot, and Pep Review Pro when available. Reviewed transparency evidence contributes a bounded amount — shown as a trust lift for source-benchmarked vendors, and folded into the base score for PB-evidence vendors.
This vendor’s score is evidence-first: verifiable testing evidence forms the backbone, and outside review sources are a bounded adjustment that can warn far more than it can boost. The terms below sum to the displayed score (small rounding aside). Full formula on the scoring methodology page.
WHAT THIS PAGE IS
- Board-ranked vendor profile with source-linked benchmark inputs
- No Finnrick score currently linked
- No Peptide Critic score currently linked
- No Trustpilot profile currently linked
- No Pep Review Pro profile currently linked
CURRENT LIMITS
- Not an original lab test or editorial review
- Source scales and methodologies differ across sites
- Depends on source site freshness and formatting
These are representative public examples from the vendor testing review queue. They show how product pages in the catalog expose public report or verification paths, but they should still be read as examples rather than proof for every current lot.
In other words: the relationship registry above captures the vendor-to-provider link itself, while the examples below show what that link looks like across real product pages.
METHODOLOGY
How to read this benchmark
This profile summarizes public benchmark data synced from Finnrick and, when available, Peptide Critic. Finnrick contributes a 10-point average from its vendor table, while Peptide Critic contributes a 5-star rating that we normalize to a 10-point scale before ranking consensus entries.
A high score can be directionally useful, but it is not a substitute for current COAs, identity testing, chain-of-custody details, or your own due diligence. We are intentionally separating source aggregation from first-party editorial claims.
Scores combine PB trust evidence with external signals from Finnrick, Peptide Critic, Trustpilot, and Pep Review Pro when available.