CURATED VENDOR PROFILE
Peptide Plugs
Included as part of the community-known shortlist, with a normalized dataset match already in place.
Same formula for every vendor: verifiable testing evidence forms the backbone; third-party reviews adjust it within a bounded range. How scoring works →
Score breakdown
Rank Composition — the terms below are the published receipt for this score. Full formula on the methodology page.
- Verified-evidence backbone
- 8.19
- Third-party reviews (bounded)
- +0.00
- Curated review bonus
- +0.15
Now one of the stronger curated testing-transparency candidates because its public COAs page exposes a structured COA map rather than just generic lab-testing language.
Readers who want a smaller but cleaner example of public COA mapping that still crosses into provider verification.
The structure is good, but the public evidence footprint is narrower than the biggest archive or verification leaders.
Public COA map with provider verification
Peptide Plugs publicly exposes vendor-hosted COA files and Freedom Diagnostics accession-based verification links from its public COAs page, which is a meaningfully stronger pattern than vague homepage purity claims.
8 public certificate examples
Representative product pages showing how this catalog exposes report or verification paths. Examples, not proof for every current lot.
Assayed content is not fill accuracy. Laboratories report net peptide content, and peptides ship as salts, so an honestly filled vial commonly assays below its gross label — a figure under 100% is not evidence of a short vial. These numbers are also not comparable between vendors: they exist only where a laboratory reports net content, so they partly reflect which laboratory a vendor uses.
Holding a certificate for this vendor that is not here? Send it to the archive →
Observed from public domain records and the vendor's own site on Aug 27, 2026. Identity facts are shown for context and do not affect scores.